[CR]performance vs. longevity :was cranks

(Example: Framebuilders:Richard Moon)

Content-return: allowed
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 14:06:35 -0400
From: "Grant McLean" <Grant.McLean@SportingLife.ca>
To: "Classic Rendezvous Mail List (E-mail)" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: [CR]performance vs. longevity :was cranks

What a struggle product managers must have.......

Professional riders have always wanted lighter weight, and don't care how long parts last or how much they cost, because they never buy them. Paying customers want the same parts as the pro's to make themselves appear authentic, assuming that the "top of the line" parts are best for their own long term use. As a retailer, I can tell you some recreational riders are bigger weight freaks than the Pro's.

Farther back than Super Record ti parts, high-end bike parts have been used other than as they were intended: for racing. Why should any part designed for racing last longer than one Tour de France.... or one stage of the Tour for that matter?

Most lower end parts don't break, so if you want parts that last, don't buy parts that push the envelope.

Grant McLean
Toronto, over flowing landfills, Canada