Chris Beyer wrote:
>
> Hey, Y'all:
>
> Any of you know of any qualitative difference between Campagnolo NR and TA Tevano cranksets? I know the Tevano was intended to cosmetically resemble the Campagnolo, but does anyone have first-hand experience with it?
My question: If the Campagnolo crank intro'd in 1958 is such a poor design, then why is a French company copying it in the the late 1970s or early 1980s when they come out with a new crank? Conspiracy theorists want to reply? Anyone?
Chuck Schmidt SoPas, SoCal
.