Re: [CR]Simplex SLJ 5500 vs 6600

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

From: Jerry & Liz Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Eric Elman" <tr4play@cox.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <1802411.1032990314742.JavaMail.monkeylad@mac.com> <003b01c26731$7d6a6ba0$ece70044@elman1> <000e01c26a25$3b7fca40$ece70044@elman1> <009201c26a58$7d54c910$ece70044@elman1>
Subject: Re: [CR]Simplex SLJ 5500 vs 6600
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:40:55 -0500

I've got two, a Gipiemme-badged one on an Allegro, and a Motobecane-badged one on a Team Champion. I believe they are horizonal parallelograms, like a Shimano Crane, not slant parallelogram, like a SunTour. The difference is that the face plates on a horizonal parallelogram still lie in a plane parallel to the freewheel cogs, while those on a slant parallelogram lie in a plane oblique to the cogs, which is the secret to maintaining a more nearly constant distance between jockey wheels and freewheel. Both my 6600's shift quite well IMHO, particularly as they are paired with Simplex Retrofriction shifters. On the other hand, I also think the Simplex 5500 shifts well, much better than a Campy NR in my opinion. I have no experience with long-cage versions of either model.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Houston, TX


----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Elman
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: [CR]Simplex SLJ 5500 vs 6600



> I'm very familiar (experienced) with the regular parallelogram(sp?) Simplex
> SLJ 5500 but have never used the Simplex SLJ 6600 slant parallelogram rear
> derailleur. Anyone on the list have experience with both items and care to
> discuss your comparison of them in use? Also, did both come in short and
> long cage versions; and with the advantage of being able to handle a greater
> amount of chain, does the long cage have any negative affect on how well
> they work?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Eric Elman
> thinking about going radical with a slant parallelogram derailleur
> Somers, CT