MM:
Why would you consider GS cranks to be outside of the CR timeframe? They are listed in the 1982 catalog, and were contemporary with R and SR before the "laser-etched" period.... Are you perhaps thinking of the later Victory and Triomphe cranks with the same chainrings?
Campy listed 35-43 and 50-53 chainrings for these cranks, BTW. 36/52 seemed to be a common setup IIRC.
Regards,
Greg Parker A2 MI USA
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Brandon Ives <monkeylad@mac.com>
> To: youngc@NetReach.Net
> Subject: Re: [CR]Interesting chainring?
> Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>
> I really liked these cranks, though they are outside of the CR list dates,
> since you could run a 50-36 and get a nice low gear without the triple. It
> just got too hard to find rings for them by the mid-90s. It looks like the
> chainrings are plentiful and cheap these days though.
> enjoy,
> Brandon"monkeyman"Ives
> SB, CA
>
>
> On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 07:36AM, <youngc@NetReach.Net> wrote:
>
> >116mm BCD it is. Sheldon has it as a 35t minimum ring. Don't know if
> Campagnolo
> >ever made a 35t but I think they had a 36t ring for that crankset.
> >
> >Charlie Young
> >Honeybrook, PA
> >
> >> On the subject of semi-interesting chainrings, do any of you have
> chainrings
> >for the
> >later-style (aluminum 5-arm) Campagnolo GS crankset? If my admittedly
> fuzzy
> >memory is
> >serving me well today, I think they used a weird bolt circle, like 116mm.
> BTW,
> >what was
> >the smallest inner made to fit this thing?
> >>
> >> Any constructive information would be most welcome.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Chris