Re: [CR]Re: Earliest SR rear?

(Example: Production Builders:LeJeune)

From: "Marc Boral" <mbikealive@dslextreme.com>
References: <20021115213232.VEFX1440.out008.verizon.net@[127.0.0.1]>
Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Earliest SR rear?
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:50:11 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)

I have a '73 SR r. der. that is actually stamped "pat. 73".

Marc Boral Long Beach, CA

-------Original Message-------

From: vze4k5n6@verizon.net Date: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:33:41 PM To: Tom Dalton; C. Andrews Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Earliest SR rear?

Tom: 1973 was the first year of production. The way to differentiate the first year SR fro later production is the first year had no patent date on it. Peter Naiman Boston, MA
>
> From: Tom Dalton <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>
> Date: 2002/11/15 Fri PM 04:27:22 EST
> To: "C. Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com>
> CC: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: [CR]Re: Earliest SR rear?
>
>
> Is the 1974 dated SR rear on Ebay the earliest Campy produced? I've never seen a 1973. Are they out there?
> Tom Dalton
> Bethlehem, PA (Were there WAS a first gen SR brake lever!)
> "C. Andrews" <chasds@mindspring.com> wrote: Grant wrote:
>
> "To: "Classic Rendezvous Mail List (E-mail)"
>
> Subject: [CR]heading to new highs? ; Ebay
>
> How high will it go? We should start betting on this
> one....
>
>
> http://ebay.com/<blah>
> 9&rd=1
>
>
> -Grant McLean
> Toronto, exchange rate 1.59, Canada"
>
> All I can say is, Mimitamadon has cost Kauzo a LOT of money
> lately..
>
> Charles "I outbid mimitamadon for a pair of wheels. Felt
> good, even if it hurt in the wallet" Andrews.
> SoCal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
>
> _______________________________________________
>

_______________________________________________

.