FW: [CR]hetchins

(Example: Production Builders:Frejus)

From: "Dave Patrick" <Patrick@aardvark-pro.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: FW: [CR]hetchins
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:00:54 -0500

-----Original Message----- From: Dave Patrick [mailto:Patrick@aardvark-pro.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:00 PM To: 'Mark Reilly' Subject: RE: [CR]hetchins

Mark,

Thanks for taking to time to address the CR list at large. I do have a few questions to ask, but I may be at a bit of a disadvantage here, as I don't know the details of U.K. laws as they relate to business names, trademarks, registrations etc. As such, some of my thoughts may be a bit off base, but please indulge me.

I feel that a lot of the vintage lightweight crowd, both in the U.K and the U.S., were aware that Hetchins were being made by Bob Jackson Cycles in Leeds during the 1980s and into the early 1990s. As I remember the press reports, the party that had taken over both Bob Jackson and Hetchins basically ran the operation into the ground by about 1993 or so, which resulted in the banks stepping in, foreclosure and the assets of BJ and Hetchins put up for sale. It was at this time that Donald Thomas stepped in the take over the Bob Jackson marque, bringing Bob Jackson himself out of retirement to lend a hand. Also at this time, didn't the Hetchins name legally end up in the hands of Jake Riviera? It is also my understanding that David Miller was then assigned management of the Hetchins marque, where it remains to date. This said, there was a clear paper trail left by the involvement of the banks and the courts in the foreclosure and sale of the Bob Jackson and Hetchins name. You surely knew of these events, as a frame builder based in the U.K. Did you ever make any effort to investigate the disposition of this sale? Did you contact Donald Thomas to ask for further information regarding the status of the Hetchins marquee? This seems to be common sense, since Jackson was the last "high profile" builder of the Hetchins frames.

Moving on, your story of discovering that there wasn't a Hetchins website rings a bit hollow with me. A business isn't required to have a website, which you surely know. Your efforts at registering or purchasing rights to Hetchins Cycles Ltd seems to be purely a grab of a dubious nature. So what if David Miller works out of the home? So what if he doesn't have email? Does that mean he isn't worthy of carrying on the Hetchins name? And you seem to be making an effort to separate your Hetchins efforts from your Omega shop, aren't you? You have two separate websites, with no link between the two, even though they are both operating from the same address. You don't even acknowledge any link to Omega in the verbiage on your Hetchins site. True? And why is that? OK, so perhaps Jake Riviera didn't properly register the Hetchins name with the U.K. government, which is what you're indicating. So in your eyes, that put the Hetchins name up for grabs? In your eyes, hasn't here been a traceable, unbroken paper trail of the Hetchins marque name into Jake Riviera's hands, with management assigned to David Miller? If not, why not? And it really doesn't matter who builds the frames for David Miller, if he indeed has been assigned legal management duties by Jake Riviera. I mean, David Miller could realistically have Hetchins frames made by anyone he chooses to and he'd be within his legal rights, wouldn't he? And what about Reynolds? They only sell the 531 curly stays to David Miller, don't they? Doesn't this lend some credence to David Miller being the legal tender of Hetchins? Omega has been forced to bend stays themselves, if I am correct, and this is quite visible on the examples of the Hetchins frames you've built.

I know this is long winded, and I appreciate your patience here. Seriously, I just seem to have some serious ethical and moral qualms about what you did in registering the Hetchins name, and now making frames under that name. Maybe you're "OK" under the letter of the law in the U.K., but I just don't know if that makes your actions right. Now, I don't want to get into a pissing contest with you, but I would very much like to hear your answer to my questions. As I said, it was big of you to reply and I am only interested in a bit of civilized debate here. Please respond and let's see if there are indeed more facts to this story that I'm mistaken about, or unaware of. Thanks for your consideration.

David Patrick Chelsea, Michigan USA

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org]On Behalf Of Mark Reilly Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:48 PM To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: [CR]hetchins

Hetchins....

Well it all started a couple of years ago when me and my business partner were registering domains names, we tried hetchins.com and were astonished to find it wasn't registered, we did so immediately. We were always under the impression that the name was owned by a pop mogul or some such, however subsequent checks were made and in fact no one owned the name, company or indeed domains.In the past few years there had not been a single advert for Hetchins, no address to write to, no number to phone!, why because there was no such company. We thought this was a crying shame given the heritage of the brand, our next step was never taken with money in mind, just through a passion for bikes. We purchased all the correct domains and paid all the government duties and registered Hetchins cycles ltd, a bona-fide business, not someone working from home, not giving out their address, phone number or even having a website.

We wanted to re-create the greatness of the brand from years gone by and set about making tools for lugs and chain stay jigs etc. We make absolutely everything in our own workshops, all by hand in the traditional fashion as taught to me by the brilliant Ron Cooper, a frame building artisan in my eyes. Only after we started to market and produce frames did we receive -one and that has been the only one to date- an email from a mr David Millar, claiming that he owned the company. Again checks were made but it seems as per our first checks, he didn't own anything. If he really did then surely he would have the following things:

an official website hetchins.com etc a genuine business address (you cant find a land address for his supposed enterprise anywhere in the uk)

Frame building, who makes his version of hetchins frames? does anyone ever ask?, we make all frames ensuring that when you but a hetchins its made by hetchins, us. Mr Millar even lets another company make fake hetchins in Australia! surely that's not correct, we can't stop this due to the legal costs involved.

Never at any time was it our intention to cause all of this fuss and controversy, we do believe that we had and have every right to do what we did, both legally and morally.

Many Thanks

Mark