In a message dated 12/2/2002 7:33:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, warbetty@sympatico.ca writes:
> Just a comment on the Suntour Superbe proprietary taper. It has been
> suggested that it is of little consequence. I beg to differ.
>
> I just went to mount a Suntour Sprint crankset on the SR Pro-AM
> frame I'm building up (thanks Jim Narlesky for the catalogue pics).
> The frame came with a Sugino BB/axle and an SR AX crank. The Sprint
> crankset ended up wedged about 3/8" out from where it's "normal"
> position would be. Far from the Cyclone front derailleur's outer
> range of movement and showing about a half inch of the taper of the
> axle round the back. Not good. Maybe I could find an shorter axle
> but I wouldn't be happy about the amount surface contact between the
> axle/crankset or the crank bolts for that matter.
>
>
In one of the later Sutherland's I believe it mentions using a later Campy
bottom bracket on Superbe Pro. (and Sprint)
The early Superbe's were Campy 144 bc clones weren't they?
A quick search finds some old postings that should help you out.
http://catfood.phred.org/
Pete Geurds
Douglassville, PA