Re: [CR]Campy NR chainline

(Example: Framebuilders:Alberto Masi)

From: "Charles T. Young" <youngc@NetReach.Net>
To: <Ebbikes@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <171.8839445.2995c669@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Campy NR chainline
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 21:52:24 -0500


Yep, you've crossed the 1978 CPSC induced chasm caused by the mandate against the dangerous flat cage derailleurs to the lipped models. I believe the CR site has a snippet provided by one of the list members on this topic. The +1.5 marking indicates the longer post '78 spindle but apparently wasn't kept on the spindles too long.

Charlie Young
Honeybrook, PA


----- Original Message -----
From: Ebbikes@aol.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:25 PM
Subject: [CR]Campy NR chainline



> I used to know this, but have forgotten how it goes. Some time in the late
> 70s to early 80s Campy changed the arrangement of their cranks and BBs , so
> that newer cranks do not line up well on older BBs and vice versa. Does
> anyone know the rules on that? I took a 175 crank (2 in a circle, 1982?) off
> a bike with a 70-SS spindle and put on a 170 (7 in a diamond, 1977?) and the
> chain line was outboard about 2-3 mm from previously. And in a separate
> case, I found a BB that has +1 68SS +1.5 on it. Anyone know what that means?
> Please reply directly as well as to the list as I don't always get all
the

> postings.

>

> Thanks!

> Bob Freeman