In a message dated 3/29/02 4:38:29 PM, rhawks@lmi.net writes:
<< Philcycles@aol.com replied:
In a message dated 3/29/02 10:34:06 AM, rhawks@lmi.net writes:
<< What size axle should I get.
130-31mm
Rob's reply: Ok.
Are there any special problems that I'll have
in building up this hub shell, designed for 124 spacing
but now with 120 spacing?
Shell is the same. >> Yes, I would like to add, ALL SHELL are SAME from 1960 non Record scripted high(large) flange hubs to mid 70's ones. I am a crazy Reord hub collector, currently I have 3 pairs of older non scripted hubs, and 15 more pairs! I have not seen any chage in the SHELL for 28 years! They only changed shafts, and locking nuts/spacers for 5,6, and 7 speeds. So, I can not agree with following comment.
<<Rob's reply: Actually, they aren't. The flange to flange difference
between this campy hub (dated 1965 by the lock nut date) and a
somewhat newer (mid 70s) campy high flange is distinct and
we would have to defenestrate the notion I think many of us
hold closely that Campy paid attention to the details. The
flange to flange difference is what first led me to think
I might be able to fit an ultra 6 on the newer hub even
with 120 spacing. The wheel on the Cinelli right now appears
to have very little dish to it at all. Something I chalked up
to the wider flange to flange dimension. >>
Best Regards to all,
KEN TODA, High Point, NC working so much for "spring" yard!