[CR]was: another perspective; now: into perspective

(Example: Racing:Jacques Boyer)

Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tom Dalton" <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <12.1efa43bf.2a0bfe78@cs.com>
Subject: [CR]was: another perspective; now: into perspective

This part says it all...
>>You aren't a bad or good person because of how you treat your
>>possessions. What matters is how you treat other human beings.

... but that it does so won't stop me from this additional comment:

Greg wrote: To be blunt, I don't really give a s*** what most other folks may think about my hobby and how I enjoy it, but I will always take the time to carefully explain what I know to someone who asks. Sharing knowledge can only help draw more people into the hobby. This list is intended to be about exactly that; I have discussed "inclusionary" vs. "exclusionary" behavior with Dale many times off-list. It saddens me when I see a few people trying to belittle others or scoff at their particular choice of ride.

It seems like a healthy thing to not give much creedence to other peoples opinions on you pursuit of something that they may not understand anyway. While I really enjoy seeing a bit of "contrast" in list member's opinions, I do enjoy the friendly tone and comraderie of this list. We all love bikes, I assume, and how this love differs is what makes this community interesting. I hope that in voicing certain strongly-held opionions I haven't alienated anyone, particularly any shy lurkers.

Tom Dalton Bethlehem, PA

---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th!