>
> Tom Donahue wrote:
> >
> > cut (with an unridden, late-70s Sachs that looks very similar to the 30th)
Chuck thoughtfully questioned then:
>
> Which begs the question: What's "wrong" with the late-70s Sachs?
Not to speak for Richard (or anyone but me, for that matter!), I'd bet that Richard and other experienced, gifted builders would all likely say that their skills have improved considerably over the years. A bike built now in whatever style or fashion is likely more refined in details, no? Even in ways that don't even meet the eye? Some say too that the tubing is better, easier to work with, more likely to come out perfectly after welding, etc. I'm in over my head here because I don't build anything, let alone bicycles. So, I think Chuck's question leads us to conclude that great builder's work has only gotten better even as their older work is like fine wine. That's a can't lose proposition with someone like RS.
This 30th Signature bike is just beautiful.
not really following the whole thread, just too busy with work
to read everything,
Douglas Brooks
Canandaigua, NY