Re: [CR]Campagnolo survival

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Columbus)

In-Reply-To: <90.29840a6c.2a760aee@aol.com>
References: <90.29840a6c.2a760aee@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 20:34:14 -0700
To: OROBOYZ@aol.com, Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: "Brandon Ives" <monkeylad@mac.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Campagnolo survival


At 11:05 PM -0400 7/28/02, OROBOYZ@aol.com wrote:
>"Perceived as"? The stuff was stinko! Synchro 1 and 2 were super lemons! In
>fact, C-Record, Victory, etc., was not all that hot either, many dumb design
>aspects and boner products (SGR pedals, Delta brakes, crappy operation aero
>brake levers, new unwanted chain ring patterns) and Croce D'Aune was a dumb
>exercise.

(A little OT) I'm with Dale, that stuff just fully sucked. OTOH I do love the C-record crank and FW hubs. I find it very interesting that they actually survived at all. I think dropping the whole MTB thing was a really good idea in the long run since it freed up R&D and production resources. With the return of the popularity of road bikes and the Daytona (now defunct) group they were able to get a foot back in the door. (Classic content here) I think the only reason they did survive was the diehard customer base they built up in the 15 years prior to Tullio's death. I'm long out of my "Campy is the best" phase of my life, but even I have a certain loyalty to them. . . I even bought an older SR seatpost this evening.
enjoy,
Brandon"monkeyman"Ives
SB, CA