Re: [CR]Re: frame longevity vs. stiffness

(Example: Events:Cirque du Cyclisme:2004)

From: <RaleighPro531@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:48:49 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: frame longevity vs. stiffness
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


In a message dated 7/1/2002 6:38:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time, GPVB1@cs.com writes:


> What exactly are "soft joints?" What do you think yields when you cold set a
>
> lugged steel frame? It's not the joints, it's the tubing (it's bending, or
> worse, buckling in some cases).
>
> Joints on a lugged steel frame do not move after a frame is built, unless
> they pull apart due to improper brazing. That's a failure.
>
> You are correct in saying that stiffer frames are stiffer....
>
>

If your saying that there is no movement between a tube and lug that are properly joined, I would be inclined to agree. Is it not possible for an overly thinned lug to flex? Would this not cause the frame to feel less rigid?.........didn't want to say soft ; )

Pete Geurds
Douglassville, PA