Re: [CR]tubing...??

(Example: Racing:Jean Robic)

From: "J.Dunn" <bikehunter@icehouse.net>
To: "nath" <ferness261@voyager.net>, "Thomas R. Adams, Jr." <KCTOMMY@msn.com>, "Classicrendezvous_1" <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <DAV99uh2AZrxJ4HrPdi0000fbf1@hotmail.com> <003901c22acc$04875c30$7b27cfa9@islandia>
Subject: Re: [CR]tubing...??
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:50:49 -0800


Nath wrote: I know that Ishiwata's triple-butted cro-mo came in both seamed and seamless versions; my Bridgestone RB-2 features the seamed tubing, whereas the RB-1 featured the seamless variety.

Ah yes, but the seamless tubing on the RB-1 was also *quad* butted on many (all ?) RB-1's. Mine has a sticker that says it is "Quadruple Butted tubes, fork and stays" And that's all I have to say since the tube type is on topic but the bikes aren't . ;-)

John Dunn in Boise ID


----- Original Message -----
From: nath
To: "Thomas R.Adams", "Jr."


<Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [CR]tubing...??


> I know that Ishiwata's triple-butted cro-mo came in both seamed and seamless
> versions; my Bridgestone RB-2 features the seamed tubing, whereas the RB-1
> featured the seamless variety. The thicknesses were different, I think, but
> I'm not sure about that.
>
> My early 80s Fuji Del Rey with its quad-butted VaLite tubing . . . I wonder
> if it's seamed. Wouldn't surprise me . . . I'm pretty sure the seamed
> tubing is less expensive.
>
> I'd guess that lots of double-butted tubing can be found in a seamed
> version; maybe Richard can let us know when he gets back from that 50-mile
> ride! Or maybe one of the other framebuilders on the list? . . .
>
> nath dresser
> spring green, wi