Re: [CR]Interesting chainring?

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

From: "Brandon Ives" <monkeylad@mac.com>
To: youngc@NetReach.Net
Subject: Re: [CR]Interesting chainring?
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:50:24 -0700 (PDT)

I really liked these cranks, though they are outside of the CR list dates, since you could run a 50-36 and get a nice low gear without the triple. It just got too hard to find rings for them by the mid-90s. It looks like the chainrings are plentiful and cheap these days though. enjoy, Brandon"monkeyman"Ives SB, CA

On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 07:36AM, <youngc@NetReach.Net> wrote:
>116mm BCD it is. Sheldon has it as a 35t minimum ring. Don't know if Campagnolo
>ever made a 35t but I think they had a 36t ring for that crankset.
>
>Charlie Young
>Honeybrook, PA
>
>> On the subject of semi-interesting chainrings, do any of you have chainrings
>for the
>later-style (aluminum 5-arm) Campagnolo GS crankset? If my admittedly fuzzy
>memory is
>serving me well today, I think they used a weird bolt circle, like 116mm. BTW,
>what was
>the smallest inner made to fit this thing?
>>
>> Any constructive information would be most welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,

>>

>> Chris