Re: [CR]It's a Personal thing! Crank length/Vintage Bicycle Quarterly

(Example: Production Builders:Peugeot:PY-10)

In-Reply-To: <3D7FC16A.D5E8EAB9@earthlink.net>
References: <B9A56F4D.8EE8%hilary.stone@blueyonder.co.uk> <000e01c259db$5d8803a0$a08c56d8@sterlingpeters>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: "joel metz, ifbma/sfbma" <magpie@messengers.org>
Subject: Re: [CR]It's a Personal thing! Crank length/Vintage Bicycle Quarterly
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 22:33:06 -0700

same goes here - it really depends on the application

road bike, mountain bike or my work bike, i still love my 175s, but i have 180s on my single speed mountain bike, and i tend to like 165s or at most 170s on fixed gears, and 170s on a tourer... and im 6'1"...

theres just so many variables in crank length preference that i think its almost impossible to create a single rule for who should ride what... though that pretty much goes for just about every aspect of bike fit, it seems...

-joel
>I'm the opposite: I ride 165, 170, 172.5 and 175 mm cranks on my
>different bikes and it's all good! (5' 10", saddle top at 75cm from
>center of BB)
>
>Chuck Schmidt
>SoPas, SoCal
>
>
>.
>_______________________________________________

--
joel metz : magpie@messengers.org : http://www.blackbirdsf.org/
bike messengers worldwide : ifbma : http://www.messengers.org/
po box 191443 san francisco ca 94119-1443 usa
==
i know what innocence looks like - and it wasn't there,
after she got that bicycle...