Re: [CR]Re: Tube removal

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

From: "goodrichbikes" <goodrichbikes@netzero.net>
To: <NortonMarg@aol.com>, <BobHoveyGa@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <15.8f36362.2b7021fa@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Tube removal
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:17:03 -0600


Stevan, You are correct. This would probably be best described as quenching. But this quote has been taken out of context. Tim Paterek posted this tidbit for a rookie that was looking to take apart an old bike and practice brazing it back together. He said that the tubing would no longer be usable as a rode worthy structure or something to that end. I grimaced when I read his posting though. I can't imagine some newbie with a torch and compressed air splattering molten filler material everywhere. Can you say "Danger Will Robinson, Danger!"

Curt Goodrich Bicycles
607 NE 22nd Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55418
612.788.6812


----- Original Message -----
From: NortonMarg@aol.com
To: BobHoveyGa@aol.com
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Tube removal



> In a message dated 1/31/03 7:21:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> BobHoveyGa@aol.com writes:
>
>
> > heat the joint then blast it
> > with compressed air... it will drive all the braze out and leave you with a
> >
> > dry joint that you can just knock apart.
>
> Would this not have the same effect on the tubing as letting it cool too
> quickly in a cold draft? It's my understanding that's the quickest way in the
> world to ruin tubing.
> Stevan Thomas
> Alameda, CA