Re: [CR]victims of campy marketing

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Avocet)

Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 20:18:03 -0700
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]victims of campy marketing
References: <719A4AAD-8C03-11D7-98C6-00039356BD92@mac.com>


Brandon Ives wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 07:57 PM, Chuck Schmidt wrote:
> > Brandon Ives wrote:
> >>
> >> Well then Chuck let me ask this, what is more original and why; what's
> >> in the catalog, what's in the box that the dealer gets, or what the
> >> customer walks out with?
> >
> > Silly question, Monkeylad. None of the above. What is the "most
> > original" is what is on the bike when it was new.
>
> You're not answering the question. I made a statement to which you
> replied, "Correct" for what Brandon? Correct original? No. Correct
> for the period? No. Correct _of_ the period? Yes."
> Tell us what correct is since you seem to have the answer? I'm asking
> a straight-forward question and if you want to make it a semantic
> argument we can if you like, but that would be much more "silly" than
> just backing up your answers. Personally "correct" is the bike the
> customer is handed in my mind.

Jeeze Brandon! Chill out, Bro.

I said, what the bike had when it was new. You said, the bike the customer is handed.

Are these different answers??????????????????????????????

Chuck "scratching my head over this one" Schmidt L.A.

.