Re: [CR]Sturmey K7 hub

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 08:26:28 +0100
Subject: Re: [CR]Sturmey K7 hub
From: "Hilary Stone" <hilary.stone@blueyonder.co.uk>
To: brucerobbins <brucerobbins@supanet.com>, michael butler <pariscycles@yahoo.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <002a01c3217f$79353840$2f4728d5@bruce>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Mick Butler was perfectly correct in suggesting that the 7 indicated the year of manufacture. There are plenty 2s, 3s, 4s etc around and this dating also applies to Sturmey Archer's other models from the time. This system of dating however only came in around 1932/3 - previously they had used a serial number on each hub - these six figure numbers all date from pre 1932. Post WWII four figure dating numbers were used indicating the month and last two digits of year. If anyone is interested in Sturmey Archer gears Tony Hadland's book The Sturmey Archer Story is a must. It can be ordered mail order through http://www.bikebook.demon.co.uk/ though I think they only keep the hardback version. If US members are interested I can get copies for them in paperback or hardback. There is a wealth of informationb on Tony Hadland's website http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~hadland/gear.html

Hilary Stone, Bristol, England

Bruce Robins wrote:
> Thanks for chiming in with that bit of info about the K7. Your theory makes
> sense except for one thing. If the digit was the year of manufacture, then
> that means there must be K2s, K3s, K4s, etc, on the go as well. That might be
> the case but I haven't heard of any. Mind you, I hadn't heard of the K7 until
> I got this hub!
>
> I've looked at the 1930s online catalogues for Sturmey hubs and can't find any
> mention of a K7 there. If what you're saying is that the K7 stamped on the hub
> refers only to a date and not a model name, then it all ties in.
>
> Anyone else able to back up Mick's dating theory with some hard evidence?