Re: [CR]Re: Vertical dropouts

(Example: Production Builders:LeJeune)

Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:56:27 -0700
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Vertical dropouts
References: <CATFOODvNyd7ExXvY2200002ee0@catfood.nt.phred.org> <002901c3645b$55c60c30$f800a8c0@bourke>


Stephen Barner wrote:
>
> I think Steven's point is that the clearance between the tire and chainstays
> is usually much less than at the seatstays. Horizontal dropouts allow one
> to cock the wheel slightly, which for many wheel/frame combinations will
> allow the tire to just miss the chainstays. Flip the QR on the rear brake
> and you can often get home without further ado (or, if it's a Varsity, you
> just continue riding it that way until something alse happens). With
> vertical dropouts you can only cock the wheel vertically, which is not
> usually where the problem needs to be addressed.

Not to put too fine a point on all this Steve, but in my experience, my highly tensioned 32 hole and 28 hole wheels went _way_ out of true when I broke a spoke, and cocking a wheel in a dropout was not going to clear the chainstays. And it only took a minute to adjust the spoke tension since I was already stopped to do something about the broken spoke that was whipping around the stays as I rode.

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, CA

.