Re: [CR]Stronglight Competition V-4 headset

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:56:55 -0500
From: "Joe Bender-Zanoni" <joebz@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Stronglight Competition V-4 headset
To: Daniel Artley <dartley@co.ba.md.us>, Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
References: <sfaa0c67.015@co.ba.md.us>


I agree with these comments and like these headsets but there is one warning.

The V-4 requires very precise alignment of the faces between the steerer threads, fork crown face, and the head tube faces. Ordinary bearings allow some misalignment while the V type and tapered roller bearings must be very precise.

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Great Notch, NJ


----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Artley
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]Stronglight Competition V-4 headset


Its what was standard on my '68 PX-10 and had a very good reputation. The headset was never quite as smooth as Campy's, but with four points of contact, it was solid and had a very good longevity. I couldn't get Campy headsets to last more than a year, but I never brinneled a V-4. Loose balls, I forget what size and the head tube had to be faced precisely, but I would love to get one myself in English thread. Anyone?

Dan Artley Parkton, Maryland
>>> markenki@hotmail.com 11/06/2003 8:29:10 AM >>>

How good is the Stronglight Competition V-4 headset? I'm interested in using it on a "working" bike, so I'd be interested in reliability and longevity.

Thanks,

Mark Bellevue, WA

--
Mark J. EncarnaciĆ³n <mark@encarnacion.org>