Ed Kasper wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/6/03 8:12:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> chuckschmidt@earthlink.net writes:
>
> > Don Gillies wrote:
> > >
> > (cut)
> > >Anyway, It's very interesting to know that Waterford was making a
> > >conscious effort to copy the Cinelli !! So when production moved from
> > >Chicago to Waterford, Wisconsin, I guess that was when paramounts
> > >started to look almost EXACTLY like cinellis from a distance !!
> >
> > And what exactly would that distance be ??
> >
> > Chuck Schmdit
> > South Pasadena, CA
> >
> >
>
> Is that one of them there rhetorical questions or are you just being a
> smartass, I mean witty. Or are you implying that a Paramount doesn't look like
> Cinelli at all?
>
> Ed Kasper
> Detroit MI
> Too tired to pick up on Chuck's subtlties today...
> And still looks good to the ladies...from 100 feet away!
Yes to all of the above! I think a Cinelli looks EXACTLY not like a Paramount... from a distance.
Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, CA
.