[CR]Campy pillar lengths and Catalog quirks (wasCampy 26.2 Seat Posts / 130mm v 180

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing)

From: <ABikie@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:14:37 EST
To: wayne.collect@xtra.co.nz, showngo@telusplanet.net, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: [CR]Campy pillar lengths and Catalog quirks (wasCampy 26.2 Seat Posts / 130mm v 180

In a message dated 11/14/2003 6:10:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, wayne.collect@xtra.co.nz writes: Hi, the #18 catalog lists both the GS and Record (NR) posts in both 130 & 180mm, it is dated 1985. The #18BIS catalig dated 1986 lists circular posts at 130mm long and the aero shaped at 180mm long. But they are all single bolt types......regards wayne davidson Invers NZ...... _______________________________________________ In my replkies to a couple of inquirees, I posted a note about some older Campy NR seat pillars. I mentioned that the 'standard' length was 220mm and the 'shorter' was 180. These lengths were the rail-to-bottom (basically overall length) and not the cylinder only as the catalog seems to specify.

I cannot figure out why they measure the cylinder length as a dimension. This has nothing to do with what a seatpost does but might just be their way of measuring.

A leter Campy rim catalog from the 80's also had a strange measurement: They listed rim weights without the eyelets that were a permanent part of the rim.

The rim weight issue was announced at the 1985 traveling factory tech siminar in Beltsville, Md. This was the seminar at which the representative , when asked about the aero effect of the newly-introduced aero post, mentioned that the aero effect might be marginal at best but had a cooling effect on the genitals.

That was not published in the catalog

Larry Black
College Park, Md.