Re: [CR]Use of the terms "vintage" and "classic" on E-Bay, Incredibleexamples

From: "Paul Williams" <castell5@sympatico.ca>
To: <Bikerdaver@aol.com>
References: <142.1c3d3130.2ce27d7f@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Use of the terms "vintage" and "classic" on E-Bay, Incredibleexamples
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 13:23:30 -0500
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

Actually, Paul Williams - the problem with being too creative with my E-Mail address.

Glad to have got the ball rolling on this discussion! And interesting to hear people's opinions!

Paul Williams,
Ottawa, ON, Canada

----- Original Message -----
From: Bikerdaver@aol.com
To: castell5@sympatico.ca
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]Use of the terms "vintage" and "classic" on E-Bay,

Incredibleexamples

> First, I have to thank Paul Castell for providing me with this Incredible gem
> below, that in my wildest dreams, I could never come up with. But I also want
> to thank the List for having this discussion. I have though many of these
> same sentiments that are now being expressed, but just didn't think anyone wanted
> to hear my perspective. Glad I was wrong, glad in the "classic" sense mind
> you, but glad none-the-less. cheers,
>
> Dave-covered with a fine layer of Patina-Anderson
> Cut Bank MT
>
> In a message dated 11/11/2003 9:23:28 AM PST, castell5@sympatico.ca writes:
> "The original owner, now in his eighties, is moving into an assisted living
> center. He always maintained this bike and all I had to do was wash a heavy
> accumulation of dust off."