Re: [CR]RE: the other...chainring

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Avocet)

From: "stevens" <stevens@veloworks.com>
To: NortonMarg@aol.com, stevens@veloworks.com, lists@PeterWhiteCycles.com
Subject: Re: [CR]RE: the other...chainring
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:44:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <59.19fe0fd.2d13482e@aol.com>
References: <59.19fe0fd.2d13482e@aol.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

I've seen brand spankin' new chainrings that were slightly bent (or should I say, "not perfectly flat") ... from a variety of manufacturers.

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:13:02 EST, NortonMarg wrote
> In a message dated 12/18/03 9:57:53 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> stevens@veloworks.com writes:
>
> > You sure the ring wasn't bent???
> >
>
> The outer SR ring was brand new, and unused as was the SR 42. The
> only change I made was the substitution of a NR 42 inner ring. There
> was then less deflection. Stevan Thomas Alameda, CA

--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash