Re: [CR]Nagasawa forkends...

(Example: Production Builders:Frejus)

To: rick-paulos@uiowa.edu
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:19:16 -0500
Subject: Re: [CR]Nagasawa forkends...
From: "Richard M Sachs" <richardsachs@juno.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

masi didn't use a pre-fabbed plug unti the Prestiges were intro'd in 75 or so. the previous 20(?) years the tops were "handmade" by mitering the stay and brazing a like-shaped plate in the area. the 3V's were intro'd in 81 and the same seatstay piece was used on these models.

and, you ask: "Wasn't masi really trying to make frame building easier and faster?" they were a production shop. you cannot fault them for seeking efficiency. e-RICHIE chester, ct

<rick-paulos@uiowa.edu> writes: Ah, the Masi influence.
   Okay, my explanation. Wasn't the fluted masi seat stay a precast item that attached to a square cut seat stay end? Wasn't one main purpose of the 3V internal lug design to eliminate the need for mitre cuts? Aren't these cool looking dropouts designed to eliminate mitre cuts? Sure speeds up the building process when you don't have to do fish mouth mitre cuts and be perfect with your brazing and filing. Wasn't masi really trying to make frame building easier and faster?