And we all know that e-CHUNKIE is the arbiter of all that is or is not on-topic on this list ... if he's not interested, then it's not on-topic, even if Dale already said the analogy is okay ... as long as the discussion doesn't degenerate into a Gibson vs. Fender vs. Rickenbacher comparison.
Steven L. Sheffield stevens at veloworks dot com veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash
> Richard Rose wrote:
\r?\n> >
\r?\n> > (cut) Obviously no one here really wants to discuss the
\r?\n> > nuances of guitar building, but the mental exercise of comparing the two
\r?\n> > processes (guitar & frame building)seems not only worthy of our interest
\r?\n> > but on-topic as well.
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Nope. Not interested in the comparison (mental exercise) of guitar and
\r?\n> frame building. And off-topic as well.
\r?\n>
\r?\n> Chuck Schmidt
\r?\n> L.A.
\r?\n>
\r?\n> .