Re: [CR]re: Campagnolo Victory (was re: what makes this list so good)

From: "jerrymoos" <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: <chasds@mindspring.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <22957502.1063680391468.JavaMail.root@wamui04.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]re: Campagnolo Victory (was re: what makes this list so good)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:50:38 -0500

The Victory/Triomphe cranks were 116 BCD, but I don't think the aesthetics were worse than NR You are correct,the brakes were very similar to NR. This stuff will soon be on-topic, due to passage of time.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Hiuston, X

----- Original Message -----
From: chasds@mindspring.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:46 PM
Subject: [CR]re: Campagnolo Victory (was re: what makes this list so good)

> If I'm thinking of the correct cranks, the Victory cranks were easily the ugliest cranks ever
> to come from the hand of man (or forge of man, anyway)
>
> But the Victory brakes were/are very nice. A combination of the old Gran Sports with the profile
> of the later Super Records. I have a set, with matching levers and they were a very, very fine
> piece of gear. Available for a song, usually, on ebay. And if they aren't in the time-line, they
> are certainly in the spirit of the list.

>

> Charles Andrews

> SoCal