Re: [CR]Triplizers ??

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:24:41 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Triplizers ??
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <f3.34a14960.2d2c9028@aol.com>


> I disagree about unobtrusive. I've got one > and the cranks look very busy with it. Here's > a picture of the bike: > http://www.paulstubblebine.com/philbrown/Italian.htm Phil, You're definitely correct as far as the entire crank is concerned. But to my eye, all triples are busy looking. I just meant that the Willow ring doesn't have all sorts of engraved or painted logos. In that respect these rings will not look out of character. I concede that the offset nature of the bolts causes the ones for the small ring to be more visible than they would be otherwise. Okay - so aesthetically, the Stronglight design is superior. But it my view, it suffers functionally. Best regards, Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus