Re: [CR]Re: Double butted vs. straight-gauge & single butted

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

From: <ABikie@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:58:45 EST
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Double butted vs. straight-gauge & single butted
To: gillies@cs.ubc.ca, murphy@io.com
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

In a message dated 1/16/2004 7:48:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, gillies@cs.ubc.ca writes: obviously, a double-butted tubeset will be thinner all around than a single butted tubeset, otherwise the single butted set will weigh less. therefore, the single-butted tube is likely to be thicker both unbutted, and after butting. it was my assertion that maybe the thin "butted" part of a single butted tube was as thick as the thick "unbutted" part of a double butted tube.

i really should stick to stuff i know (e.g. not framebuilding).

i hope some 531 framebuilder can clear this up for us.

- Don Gillies San Diego, CA _______________________________________________ Hey, not to worry. Why not just come fess up in person while Dale and I are out your way Feb 4 with the bike conference. I can't find Dave Field for a loaner bike. Anybody have a road machine (doesn't even need to be butted!) in a 52-58, I'm not picky.

Thank
Larry Black
Mt airy, Md