Re: [CR]Re: old stuff

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

To: jeremylieberman@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:08:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: old stuff
From: "Richard M Sachs" <richardsachs@juno.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

not sure what u r saying... e-RICHIE aka Richard M Sachs chester, ct

<jeremylieberman@earthlink.net> writes: e-richie writes: "i can't think of a reason to use the old stuff - except

that some of it is pretty."

e: IMHO, I'm not sure if your suppostion, reasons to use the old stuff, is the same as what many here are using in the first place. I believe many here are using the rationale of: reason's to use old and/ or new stuff, and reason's not to use new and/ or old stuff. And such people are coming up with the decision: hey there are not enough good reasons *not* to use the old stuff as compared with the new. i.e. its at very least good enough.
Jeremy Lieberman
NYC NY