Re: [CR]Yesterdays wheels...

(Example: Events)

Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 12:14:02 -0700
Subject: Re: [CR]Yesterdays wheels...
To: <jeffas@us.ibm.com>, chasds@mindspring.com
From: "jack b" <jack_bissell@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFDBF727A4.C24815DB-ON87256E92.005DFD62-86256E92.005ED904@us.ibm.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Jeff

Vintage rims were as light as 220g (Scheeren wood-filled) and silk tires for "special events" were as light as 150g. The bare wheels on my 1980 Raleigh http://www.mookietwoh.com/ti-753.jpg weigh 1170g.

Comparing complete wheels, them there 24/28hole Fiamme Ergals w/ light silks and a Campagnolo 6sp freewheel are 250g lighter than my Zipp 404s w/ Vittoria CXs and a ti record 10 cassette.

On the other hand, thanks to those UCI retro-grouches we see that modern wheels contribute to at least a 5 kph advantage : Chris Boardman going 49.441km http://www.lookcycle.fr/infos/images/infos/look_infos/6/boardman.gif Chris Boardman going 56.375km http://www.fatnick.com/hour38.jpg

jack "much lighter in the 80s" bissell tucson

On Wednesday, May 12, 2004, at 10:16 AM, Jeff Stuecheli wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Been lurking on the "yesterdays equipment in modern races" topic, and
> have
> seen several references to light weight wheels of the era being just as
> light as modern carbon rim jobs.
>
> Which wheels/rims were these? How much did they weight? How well did
> they
> hold up?
>
> For comparison, my zipp 404 weigh in at 1283 grams for the set (365 gm
> rims). The rim depth is pretty deep at 58mm. They hold up and ride
> very
> well (I am ~187 pounds). Cost is $1300 bucks for the set. The
> shallow rim
> zipp 202 set is 1040 gms. Braking is sub-par on the carbon rims (you
> do
> brake in racing, or you go off the side like Jan Ulrich a few years
> back...).
>
>
> Jeff Stuecheli
> Austin, TX