Re: [CR]Re: measuring stay lengths

(Example: Framebuilders:Jack Taylor)

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:51:11 -0500
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: measuring stay lengths
From: "Todd Kuzma" <tullio@theramp.net>
To: r cielec <teaat4p@yahoo.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040811051806.39996.qmail@web52009.mail.yahoo.com>


on 8/11/04 12:18 AM, r cielec at teaat4p@yahoo.com wrote:
> So, why do people think / feel longer stay bikes (touring etc...) are more
> sluggish than shorter stay bikes (race)? Wind-up, less agile.... Wheel base
> and rake should not affect acceleration, should it?

Most longer chainstay bikes have a more laid-back geometry. I suspect that the slower handling contributes to the perception that the bike is more sluggish. It would be interesting to try a long-stay bike that has a crit geometry to see how that feels.

Todd Kuzma
Heron Bicycles
Tullio's Big Dog Cyclery
LaSalle, IL
http://www.heronbicycles.com/
http://www.tullios.com/