Re: [CR]Damage at Bike Shops

(Example: Production Builders)

From: <"richardsachs@juno.com">
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:02:25 GMT
To: smwillis@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [CR]Damage at Bike Shops
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

don't you then question your suppliers re their standards? you/they can verify alignment if there are no bearing surfaces to reference? with 9 and 10 cog cassettes, these issues are more important than ever. go to the window and have a howard beale moment: "i'm mad as hell and i'm not going to take it anymore..."
e-RICHIE
chester, ct


-- "Steven Willis" wrote:


I can vouch for that. Even when the manufacture says they are faced and taped I find they are more often not . Steven Willis 1778 East Second Street Scotch Plains NJ 07076 908-322-3330 http://www.thebikestand.com


----- Original Message -----
From: richardsachs@juno.com
To: tullio@TheRamp.net
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]Damage at Bike Shops


>
> then how do you assume the alignment is checked
> if there are no surfaces to reference?
> e-RICHIE
> chester, ct
>
>
>
> -- Todd Kuzma <tullio@TheRamp.net> wrote:
> on 9/10/04 10:52 AM, richardsachs@juno.com at richardsachs@juno.com wrote:
>
> > i have no antidote for that, otoh, i don't
> > believe the lack of machining issue is that
> > widespread; you simply cannot proceed with
> > various framebuilding tasks with do some
> > others first. machining the ht and bb fall
> > into that category.
>
> It is VERY widespread. I'd say that most "production" frames and many
> supposed "limited production handcrafted 100% pure malt and hops" frames have head tubes that have never been faced or reamed.