Re: [CR]Paramount Lugs

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:50:57 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: "rocketman531" <rocketman531@earthlink.net>
To: Huemax@aol.com, prutledge1@comcast.net, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Paramount Lugs


Ken,

Sorry, but in your story, two of the children are indeed simple, elegant and clean. But the other is just a little more lovely.

Pat Moffat Tempe AZ, Getting ready to prune the roses.

-----Original Message----- From: Huemax@aol.com Sent: Jan 13, 2004 7:36 AM To: prutledge1@comcast.net, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR]Paramount Lugs

In a message dated 1/12/04 7:02:56 PM, prutledge1@comcast.net writes:


> In my humble opinion, I don't mind the Prugnat BB, but I like to see the
> greater beauty of the Nervex lugs in the locations that really show; i.e.,
> the seat lugs and the head lugs.  So, for me, a Paramount with all Prugnat
> lugs is somewhat less desirable and less valuable.  But that is just one
> person's opinion.
>

Hi, list,

I have three All Chrome Paramount's of which two are Prugnat lugs.

It is my understanding that Nervex is in majority for number and popularity, however; to my personal opinion, Prugnat is as beautiful as Nervex. It is simple, elegant, and clean looking.

In a way, you have a daughter and a son, both are just lovely children in equal.

Regards,

KEN TODA, High Point, NC