Re: [CR]No more DeRosas : they all broke ?!?!

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:33:49 -0800
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]No more DeRosas : they all broke ?!?!
References: <c1.4ab9a8ee.2ebe963a@aol.com> <418D865C.1070302@nonlintec.com>


Steve Maas wrote:
> (snip... about the test)
> To me, this is sloppy work, decorated with sloppy thinking.

Steve, reading your conclusion above makes me wonder why you wrote your original question: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Do you wonder if perhaps the reason why the early 1970's SLX DeRosas are so rare, is because these framesets have all broken ?? Quite possibly - after all, the DeRosa in this fatigue-limit test performed the worst out of 20 bikes !! And will we be stuck with TREK OCLV frames for a long, long, long time because apparently they are balanced in a way that allows them to survive many fatigue cycles ??" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reads pretty much like a troll? Or perhaps the emoticon was missing?

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California

.