Re: [CR]Settling the ugliness debate

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:55:24 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
From: "Pete Imandt" <imandt@earthlink.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Settling the ugliness debate



> Bruce of Dundee wrote:
>
> The easiest way to end this topic is to stand Bob Reid against a door, put a
> mark at the top of his head and measure from the floor upwards. Or use a
> Masi as a yardstick...
> (And that's hard to say with your tongue in your cheek)

How about a simpler: Ugly is as ugly does?

Of course, we all know "truth is beauty, and beauty is truth." So, does that make a classic that's been "lying" around ugly?

Now that that's seemingly settled, how about a finite formula to define Mojo?

Pete Imandt,
Ramona, CA