Re: [CR]Regina Corse, Extra, and Oro Freewheels

(Example: Production Builders)

From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
To: "Stephen Barner" <steve@sburl.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <MONKEYFOODdnHM3SOlb00000c06@monkeyfood.nt.phred.org> <001101c4d485$d225ad80$6400a8c0@bourke>
Subject: Re: [CR]Regina Corse, Extra, and Oro Freewheels
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:00:20 -0800
reply-type=original

It's only what was said at the time. Maybe they had a regular production and a dx production run and colored them accordingly. A lot of the earlier machining wasn't always that exact on stock corsas so we'd notice big differences in the finished products, and regularly have to take one cluster off and replace it. Some were so bad it was difficult to adjust the derailleurs, others so smooth they felt like silk and were so quiet it brought a smile to one's face In our opinion consistency was far better and constant on the oros, but as you mentioned it deteriorated towards the end of the run. Again, the quality control on washers varied so we had to regularly added or delete same to get good bearing adjustment. Ahhh- The pleasures of not worshipping at the font of mediocrity. Ted Ernst


----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Barner
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]Regina Corse, Extra, and Oro Freewheels



>I don't think this is true. The bodies and cogs of these freewheels were
> heat treated and most of the imperfections that I have seen in these
> looked
> like they might be a result of that heat treatment or would not be
> noticeable until after assembly, like noisy or loose bodies. You can't
> really tell if a freewheel spins straight by spinning it in your hand, and
> I
> doubt Regina took the time to mount each freewheel and measure runout.
> Since the bodies before about 1980 had the model name stamped into the
> outer
> cone, and this was done before heat treatment, I can't see how Regina
> would
> have picked the model it would belong to anywhere but at the beginning of
> the manufacturing process.
>
> I don't think there was any real difference between the Oro freewheels and
> the Extras or G.S. Course models, though it did seem that the Extras more
> often had a personality that expressed itself when coasting. Some were
> true
> Italian tenors. As a mechanic, these rejects from the sales floor often
> found their way to my bike, back in the day. I have noticed that the
> bodies
> and cogs made before the late '60s appear to have a bit higher precision
> than the later freewheels, though things improved a bit with the changes
> made around 1980.
>
> Steve Barner, Bolton, Vermont
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:39:49 -0800
>> From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
>> To: <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CR]Regina Corse, Extra, and Oro Freewheels
>>
>> During the production years, it was claimed that the oros were the select
>> percentage of quality control and the plated to be the dx model at a
> higher
>> price of course. In typical Italian fashion, if true, this was probably
> good
>> for several years, and then sort of blended in to some production
>> difference. It did seem that the oros were somewhat smoother and
> straighter
>> than the corsas.
>> Ted Ernst