At 12/29/2004 9:22:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, Mount Baylis erupted, raining
hot lava over all of southern California:
> I do not understand those who ride vintage frames outfitted with modern
components. I hear all of the reasons, excuses, and rational. Still makes me
heartsick.
>There are two sides of the fence. I'm standing over HERE. If you're on the
other side of the fence, I'd prefer not to know you; or at least don't let me
find out you're not on my side. I have a strong distaste for what I believe
there is no excuse for, that is not based in selfishness and/or greed and a basic
disrespect for what a vintage bike is all about.
Brian, I truly respect your opinion and for the most part I agree with you, but I do believe there are some unaddressed shades of gray here.
I am one of those folks who feels sadness and anger when I see a clean all-original classic parted out. I am one of those folks who loves the ride of steel and the visual appeal of a lugged frame. But I am also one of those folks who loves new components, at least on my everyday rider... I say this without shame or fear, knowing full well the outrage such a statement might provoke in these hallowed halls (can an email list have halls?).
What is one to do in such a case, when a modern steel frame by a KOF is beyond one's means? Many of us can't afford a modern Sachs or Weigle, others can't even afford a more modestly priced Waterford or one of Rivendell's imports.
What if what we CAN afford is a used vintage frame? Say a late '80's San Marcos Masi in my case (out of the CR timeline maybe, but still a vintage frame. Granted, maybe it's no Sachs or Weigle, but then again it sure suits my temperament a whole lot better than Carbon or Aluminum). Is it so upsetting to outfit such a frame with new components and ride it lovingly and often? Is Joe Starck gunning for me because of my sacrilege?
Now I would be the first to cry bloody murder if somebody took an old late 60's Cinelli and tried to hot rod it with new gear (even if that same 60's Cinelli had already been hot rodded with early 70's gear by its original owner). It's just not right.
On the other hand, surely it is possible to adapt a later classic to more modern equipment (much as the aforementioned Cinelli's orignal owner saw fit to do, back in the day) without risking eternal damnation.
Bob Hovey
Columbus, GA