Re: [CR]Now: Bilaminate construction Was: Ritchey with faux lugs?!?

(Example: Framebuilding)

Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 14:47:18 -0800
From: "Chuck Schmidt" <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Now: Bilaminate construction Was: Ritchey with faux lugs?!?
References: <OF4E955D44.FD2E8255-ON85256E99.006BFEAC-85256E99.006F8F5A@mail.gm.com> <40ABD3EA.CED53F39@earthlink.net> <000001c43de8$165b3680$9fea6ed1@computer>


goodrichbikes wrote:
>
> Chuck "the torch" Schmidt posted-
> > Very easy way to mass produce fancy, seemingly "hand cut," lugs from
> > sheet steel.
>
> I agree with your labeling of the technique as bilaminate but the above
> assesment seems dubious. The technique isn't a shortcut to mass produce.
> Bilaminate isn't an attempt to "trick" someone into thinking it's a lug.
> It's a look onto itself. Not really my cup 'o tea but a "very easy way to
> mass produce...?" I don't think so at least not when I've done it.
>
> Curt Goodrich
> Minneapolis, MN

Old, well covered topic in the past, but I guess you missed it: Making ornate lugs on the order of fancy Hetchins-style ornateness. A stack of sheet metal is cut all at the same time for many copies. I guess "easy" is a relative term, but it sure beats cutting them one at a time. I didn't say anything about "tricking" someone, did I??? Yes, and back in the day (1940s England), it was a shortcut to mass produce. Lugless and lugged.

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California

.