Re: [CR]Frame integrity

(Example: Humor:John Pergolizzi)

From: <"richardsachs@juno.com">
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:09:34 GMT
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Frame integrity



snipped:


-- Joe Bender-Zanoni wrote:


"Functionally, I think spreading old frames with tubing like 531 is not much of a problem."

i'm not down on this or any similar posts on this issue aujourd hui. trying to create situations that validate yanking around rear triangles on a list like this seem counterproductive. how different is coldsetting a classic frame for a 10 speed cassette than adding braze-ons for a front der or cutting off lever bosses on a cinelli and adding h.t. ports for sti levers. this is the freaking cr list. i thought many folks wanted to "protect" those old war horses from the likes of modern intruders/intrusions? if having 10 cogs is so important, why not get a modern frame. quite often "patina" and "provenance" are thread subjects in and of themselves. if cr listees start okay-ing rearranging frames for use with 2004 spec-ed parts, what is the point?
e-RICHIE
chester, ct
collects old - rides new