Re: [CR]Re: measuring stay lengths

(Example: History)

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Joe Starck" <josephbstarck@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: measuring stay lengths
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <20040811.144309.2312.32.richardsachs@juno.com>


Richard, 'tis true I cursed, but pray tell how I contradicted myself? Starck, Joe


--- Richard M Sachs wrote:


> if my stated jigged dimension is along the
> virtual centerline, then you not only contra-
> dicted youself, you also cursed.
> e-RICHIE
> chester, ct
>
>
>
>
>
> snipped:
> Joe Starck <josephbstarck@yahoo.com> writes:
> Now then, it is tue that there is a substantial
> difference (close to a half centimeter is what I
> recall) between measuring along the centerline of
> the
> frame's central plane (i.e., in line with the main
> triangle, not the stays) and measuring along the
> stay
> -- on a naked frame -- BUT, when you measure with
> the
> parts ON, from the center of the crank bolt to the
> center of the skewer, the difference between this
> measured dimension via your tape and Richard S's
> stated dimension as he jigs along the central plane,
> is about one fucking millimeter.
> Starck,
> Joe
>
>

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail