Re: [CR]WTB: very small chainring for Stronglight 93

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing:Falck)

Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]WTB: very small chainring for Stronglight 93
To: BobHoveyGa@aol.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <fe.1c6f801.2e8059b5@aol.com>


Yeah, if a 130 BCD Dura Ace will take a 39T, a 122 BCD Stronglight ought to go lower than 38T.

Regards,

Jerry Moos Houston, TX

BobHoveyGa@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 9/19/04 10:34:16 PM, classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org writes:


>
> At 07:50 PM 9/19/04 -0400, PBridge130@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> >I've got a Stronglight 93 that has the outer ring/pants guard -- in other
> >words, it's set up as a triple, with the pants guard in the outer ring
> >position.
> >
> >Could anyone provide an inner ring small enough to make this a triple?
> Say,
> >something in the 30's? Does that exist? My 42 looks like it's approaching
> >the bolt diameter minimum, but not yet there.
>
> Pierre,
> Can't help you find a ring, but according to;
> http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_bo-z.html#bcd
> 38t is the minimum for your crank.
>
> Mark Stonich;
> BikeSmith Design & Fabrication LLC
> http://bikesmithdesign.com
>

I distinctly remember putting a 36 on my 93.

Bob Hovey
Columbus, GA