Re: [CR]Re: Team Pro (was possible new high for unica...)

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Team Pro (was possible new high for unica...)
To: chuckschmidt@earthlink.net, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <415388B0.631203BA@earthlink.net>


Hey, post early and often. On the first Tuesday of November, I will vote the same way for George Bush. BTW, it's 11:30 PM here in the east, so it is getting late, my bedtime at least. Hope you're feeling better, sounds like that's the case.

Regards,

Jerry Moos

Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net> wrote: Jerome & Elizabeth Moos wrote:
>
> Not sure, some here thought the Team Pro would have been available as an option in 1973. By the way, two weeks later I actually bought another mint chrome Paramount, this one was listed as a 1971, but the date on the RD is 1972. This one is exactly as represented (except for being one year off) and seems totally original. Is a Team Pro on a 1972 pushing it too much? Should I go with the small rivet Pro instead? By the way, the cranks are undated. When did Campy start dating the NR cranks? Is there an easy way to date a Paramount from the serial #? The Unicanitor on this latest Paramount looks to be original, in good shape except the black color is worn on one side. A little black shoe dye would probably make it look much better.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> Houston, TX

Errrrr... Jerry... this is your 14th post of the day and it's not even that late yet...

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California

.