Re: [CR]Campy Crank breakage, missing point and alternatives

(Example: Framebuilders:Tony Beek)

Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:29:01 -0400
From: Marcus Coles <marcoles@ody.ca>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Campy Crank breakage, missing point and alternatives
References: <129.4bb7cfae.2e7b380c@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <129.4bb7cfae.2e7b380c@aol.com>


Greetings,

Warning: Newbie alert Is top posting the norm around here?

A Gipiemme Track crank, (the bike has a decal date of Jan, 1981)

Notice the generous radius between the arm and spider of this Campy look alike. http://www.ody.ca/~marcoles/GPMCrank1.jpg http://www.ody.ca/~marcoles/GPMCrank2.jpg

Marcus Coles London, Ontario, Canada

Bikerdaver@aol.com wrote:
>Hey all,
>I can agree with Greg in that I have never broken a Campy crank and I think
>as Mike K. correctly said, all vintage cranks have the possibility of failure.
>Personally, I think an additional "missing point" is that other Italian
>manufacturers, i.e., Gipiemme, were well ahead of the curve as compared to Campy in
>this regard. I have owned and used a 1980 vintage GPM crank that had extra
>"beefiness" (for lack of a better word) at the crank arm/spider arm junction.
>Many of you already know that Campy didn't start making any design changes to
>their SR/NR cranks until appearance of the "non-fluted"/"laser-etched logo"
>cranks; a good 5 years After GPM introduced their answer to this problem. Just
>something to think about when valuing vintage components.
>Here is one of these GPM cranks I refer to on ebay. I would only add that I
>do not know the vintage of this crankset and it appears that the seller does
>not either.
>
>http://ebay.com/<blah>

>=1

>

>cheers-

>Dave Anderson

>Cut Bank MT