RE: [CR]NOW: My beloved file marks. WAS: Your CR Post

(Example: Production Builders:Pogliaghi)

From: "Bruce Gordon" <bgcycles@svn.net>
To: "'Raymond Dobbins'" <raydobbins2003@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [CR]NOW: My beloved file marks. WAS: Your CR Post
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:02:35 -0800
Organization: Bruce Gordon Cycles
In-Reply-To: <20050128190915.51653.qmail@web60404.mail.yahoo.com>
Thread-Index: AcUFbNxE3Nwz88puQHSBwJjiVIVG+wADiktw
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

-----Original Message----- From: Raymond Dobbins [mailto:raydobbins2003@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 11:09 AM To: bgcycles@svn.net Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: RE: [CR]NOW: My beloved file marks. WAS: Your CR Post


>you mentioned you noticed filemarks as well as flaws on e-ritchie's
>frame - if you care to elaborate, apart from filemarks, what flaws are
>you referring to?

Some of the pics I noticed flaws/filemarks DSC00008 - Head Lug DSC00015 - Fork Crown DSC00017 - Seat lug DSC00031 - Fork Crown These or the numbers on e-Richie's photo page. These are just a few that I noticed. But after reading CR posts - what makes this frame great is that it resembles an old Cinelli, as far as filemarks go. Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that this is a poor frame. Just that I could never send out a frame with that many "flaws". I am just amazed what people will overlook in the work of a "Supposed Legend". Maybe I'm just too picky??
Regards,
Bruce Gordon