Re: [CR]Duopar insted of Rallye ? Query NOT an argument

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:05:19 -0700
Subject: Re: [CR]Duopar insted of Rallye ? Query NOT an argument
To: r cielec <teaat4p@yahoo.com>
From: "Brandon Ives" <brandon@ivycycles.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050417231420.38253.qmail@web52008.mail.yahoo.com>
cc: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

Sort of. . . the Duopar was picked if you wanted the bike to shift well. The Rally was a POS and was used if you wanted to look coooool. best, Brandon"monkeyman"Ives Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

On Sunday, Apr 17, 2005, at 16:14 US/Pacific, r cielec wrote:
> Ahoy !
>
> This is not intended to incite debate of which is better. This is a
> straight-up inquiry of choosing period correct options.
>
> Don't wish to mix French and Italian components but, I "don't know
> from nothing" regarding long cage rear mechs.
> Am I correct in thinking the Duopar would be the French long cage
> alternative to the Campag Rallye ? Bikes would most likely be 70-ish
> to end of time line.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Richard Cielec
> Chicago, Illinois
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!