RE: [CR]Huret Duopar (Alu or Ti) ?

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli:Laser)

From: "Ken Freeeman" <freesound@comcast.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: RE: [CR]Huret Duopar (Alu or Ti) ?
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:10:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4262DBFA.2030508@new.rr.com>
Thread-Index: AcVDmH2GMuU9wZ7PRpmIHkY0V5XBQgAEktOQ


I thought the Duopar was aluminum, and the Eco-Duopar was steel!

Ken Freeman, Ann Arbor, MI

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of John Thompson Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 5:58 PM To: Amir Avitzur Cc: Classicrendezvous Subject: Re: [CR]Huret Duopar (Alu or Ti) ?

Amir Avitzur wrote:
> Does anybody know how to distinguish between the Aluminum Huret Dupoar
> and Titanium Huret Duopar?

AFAIK, the DuoPar was only available in two versions; the Titanium body and cage one, and the steel body/cage "Eco" version. The titanium one has a distinctive grayish cast to the metal, and is non-magnetic. Here a picture of both, with the Ti one on the left:

http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/duopar.jpg

The Ti version also has ball-bearing pulleys vs plain sleeve pulleys on the Eco model.

--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA