Re: [CR]Re: Should we use vintage terms or dilute our passion?

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:49:45 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: "Guy Apple" <cinelliguy@earthlink.net>
To: tsan7759142@comcast.net, ternst1@cox.net
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Should we use vintage terms or dilute our passion?
cc: "Classicrendezvous@Bikelist.Org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>

To Tom and all,

I too share your position, completely. There is no sense in putting our "nose the air" too far.

Wish you well,

Guy Apple Sunnyvale, CA

-----Original Message----- From: Tom Sanders <tsan7759142@comcast.net> Sent: Apr 25, 2005 7:38 AM To: ternst1@cox.net Cc: "Classicrendezvous@Bikelist.Org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Subject: [CR]Re: Should we use vintage terms or dilute our passion?

Ted, With all due respect, I fail to see where someone should be censored for using a term different from that which you use. I also fail to see how not using vintage terms dilutes our passion. Perhaps it dilutes yours, I feel it does no harm to mine. Fact is, if someone feels comfortable using a reasonably correct term that we all know and share the meaning of, it hurts no one. Perhaps it is just my cussed independence that makes me eschew line dancing or even pace lines, for that matter, but I'll be darned if I want to part of anything where other folks prescribe my methods of expression to the extent that I must be in lock step with them. Celebrate diversity! I'm darn glad the guy is out riding his bike! Let him call it a fixie if he chooses. Some of us sometimes refer to "Campy" parts, to rather than Campagnolo, but just because others would do it differently is no reason for them to change unless they should choose to do so. Censoring folks is all too easy...let us appreciate them instead.
Tom Sanders
Lansing, Mi