Re: [CR]what's the beef with maillard 600 hubs?+

(Example: Framebuilders:Masi)

Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 16:39:42 -0500
From: "John Thompson" <JohnThompson@new.rr.com>
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]what's the beef with maillard 600 hubs?+
References: <20050506114602.8695.qmail@web81010.mail.yahoo.com> <427BC064.C7131E8@earthlink.net> <427BDFB6.3020404@new.rr.com> <427BEFAC.3F601D23@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <427BEFAC.3F601D23@earthlink.net>


Chuck Schmidt wrote:
> John Thompson wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
>>But seriously, one of the reasons Trek spec'ed the Helicomatic was
>>because it allowed easy removal of the freewheel without requiring a
>>large wrench or bench vice. That way a rider on e.g. an extended tour
>>(touring bikes were big in the early 80's) could readily replace a
>>broken spoke on the road.
>
>
>
> And if per chance you had any problems with your Trek spec'd Helicomatic
> on your extended tour of the U.S. it would always be a piece o' cake
> readily finding replacements in any hamlet, town or city... <grin>

But that never happens, does it? :-)

Another reason it was spec'ed is that both Bevil Hogg and Harry Spehar were die-hard Francophiles...

--
John (john@os2.dhs.org)
Appleton WI USA